States › Wisconsin › Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Clarios, LLC
OSHA: no recordInjuries: 3 yrLabor: no recordImmigration: 27 LCAContracts: not listed
The federal record for Clarios, LLC, Glendale, Wisconsin, consists of 27 labor condition applications, 10 PERM applications and 3 years of injury summaries; the employer is classified under Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing.
On its 2025 Form 300A summary the employer reported 601 employees and 1 recordable case, a total recordable case rate of 0.2 per 100 full-time workers, lower than the pooled rate for its industry (1.9; median establishment 1.2).
It filed 27 labor condition applications with OFLC across fiscal years 2025–2026, covering 27 worker positions. The median offered wage is $125,000 a year against a median prevailing wage of $104,395, in line with the median across all employers for its most common occupation ($138,494). The most common prevailing wage level is Level III (37% of filings).
OFLC records 10 PERM labor certification applications from the employer with a median offered wage of $117,047; the employer reported 714 employees on payroll.
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Citations may be contested; the status shown reflects the record at the data date. Enforcement data through 14 Sep 2026.
No OSHA inspection of this employer in Wisconsin appears in the enforcement data since 2016. Inspections are recorded at the establishment; sites in other states are listed under those states.
Injuries OSHA Injury Tracking Application, Form 300A
Establishments submit their own Form 300A summaries; OSHA publishes the data as submitted and does not verify it. Rates are per 100 full-time workers (cases × 200,000 ÷ hours worked). Calendar years 2023–2025.
Injury rate vs industry
Total recordable case rate for 2025. The industry median is the median rate across establishments with at least 20,000 hours in NAICS 335 (quartiles 0.0–3.1); "overall" rates pool all hours and cases.
By year
| Year | Establishments | Employees | Hours | Deaths | Days away | Restricted/transfer | Other | TRC rate | DART rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 571 | 1,126,848 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| 2024 | 1 | 562 | 1,153,737 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 | 1 | 601 | 1,238,436 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.0 |
Figures sum every establishment filed under this employer name in Wisconsin. Rates are blank where fewer than 2,000 hours were reported.
Labor Wage and Hour Division
The Wage and Hour Division publishes concluded compliance actions since fiscal year 2005; amounts are back wages the employer agreed to pay and civil money penalties assessed, as recorded at case conclusion. Data through 15 Jun 2026.
No concluded Wage and Hour Division compliance action names this employer in Wisconsin in the data since fiscal year 2005.
Immigration Office of Foreign Labor Certification
Employer-specific case information was provided to OFLC by employers who submitted foreign labor certification applications. These are not employer responses to the Bureau of Labor Statistics' survey. Wage levels I–IV are as the employer stated on the application. LCA data through 30 Jun 2026; PERM through 30 Jun 2026.
H-1B labor condition applications
Applications by fiscal year
Prevailing wage levels
Level I 0%Level II 33%Level III 37%Level IV 30%Not stated 0%
| Measure | This employer | SOC 15-1252 | Wisconsin | US |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median offered wage | $125,000 | $138,494 | $113,621 | $122,221 |
| Offered wage, 25th–75th percentile | $121,500–$144,000 | $112,923–$170,239 | — | — |
| Share at Level I or II | 33% | 53% | 51% | 56% |
Wages annualised from the rate and unit on the application (hourly × 2,080). Medians use up to 400 sampled applications per employer. The occupation column is the employer's most common SOC code, Software Developers, across all employers.
Top job titles
| Job title | Filings | Median wage |
|---|---|---|
| Systems Engineer | 2 | — |
| IT SR System Analyst | 2 | — |
| Battery System Modeling Engineer | 2 | — |
| Lead Electronics Engineer | 2 | — |
| Data Scientist and Analytics Lead | 1 | — |
| Senior Requirements Analysis Engineer | 1 | — |
| Director of Quality-US/CA | 1 | — |
| Hardware Requirements Engineer | 1 | — |
| Software Project Manager | 1 | — |
| Lead Requirement Engineer | 1 | — |
| Manager, Master Data Management | 1 | — |
| IBM Maximo (MAS) Techno Functional Lead | 1 | — |
Occupations (SOC)
| Occupation | Filings | SOC median wage |
|---|---|---|
| Software Developers | 4 | $138,494 |
| Mechanical Engineers | 4 | $107,146 |
| Validation Engineers | 3 | $108,000 |
| Computer and Information Systems Managers | 2 | $200,006 |
| Electronics Engineers, Except Computer | 2 | $151,091 |
| Computer Occupations, All Other | 2 | $114,808 |
| Data Scientists | 2 | $123,741 |
| Architectural and Engineering Managers | 1 | $183,000 |
Worksite states
Wisconsin 19 · Michigan 6 · Ohio 1 · North Carolina 1
Visa classes: H-1B 27. Applications are attributed to the employer's state on the form (Wisconsin); worksites may be elsewhere.
PERM labor certification (green card sponsorship)
Top PERM job titles
| Job title | Applications |
|---|---|
| Advance Quality Systems & Problem Solving Mgr Quality US/CA | 1 |
| Business Domain Lead | 1 |
| Master Data Management Manager | 1 |
| Manufacturing & Controls Engineer III | 1 |
| Manufacturing & Controls Engineer II | 1 |
| IT Security Engineer | 1 |
| Product Design Engineer | 1 |
| Software Safety Engineer | 1 |
| IT SAP DBT & Principal Architect | 1 |
| IT System Analyst - Manufacturing Engineering | 1 |
Contracts USAspending.gov
USAspending recipient totals are federal contract obligations reported by awarding agencies for the latest twelve months; a recipient profile is a company-level record, not a per-state one. Retrieved 1 Oct 2026.
Not among the top 3,903 federal contract recipients loaded from USAspending for the latest twelve months. Smaller awards can be searched on USAspending.gov.
Questions and answers
Has OSHA inspected Clarios, LLC?
No OSHA inspection of Clarios, LLC in Wisconsin appears in the enforcement data since 2016.
Were there penalties, and are they final?
No OSHA record, so no penalties to report.
Did the Labor Department find back wages due from Clarios, LLC?
No concluded Wage and Hour Division compliance action names Clarios, LLC in Wisconsin in the data since fiscal year 2005.
Does Clarios, LLC sponsor H-1B workers, and at what wages?
It filed 27 labor condition applications in fiscal years 2025–2026; 26 were certified. The median offered wage is $125,000 a year; the most common job title is Systems Engineer.
Does Clarios, LLC sponsor green cards (PERM)?
OFLC records 10 PERM applications in fiscal years 2024–2026, 9 of them certified.
Does Clarios, LLC hold federal contracts?
It is not among the top federal contract recipients loaded from USAspending; smaller awards are not covered on this site.
Have there been union elections at Clarios, LLC?
NLRB election results are not loaded on this site at present, so this page cannot say either way. The NLRB publishes recent election results and a case search on nlrb.gov.
Is this the same company as the one I am looking for?
Records are matched by normalised name and state. Subsidiaries, franchisees and other states' entities have their own records. See the methodology for how matching works.
Provenance
OSHA inspections and violations: US Department of Labor enforcement data, data.dol.gov, through 14 Sep 2026, inspections opened since 2016. Injury summaries: OSHA Injury Tracking Application Form 300A data, calendar years 2023, 2024, 2025. Wage and Hour compliance actions: data.dol.gov, concluded cases through 15 Jun 2026. LCA and PERM: OFLC disclosure files, fiscal years 2025–2026 through 30 Jun 2026. Federal contracts: USAspending recipient API, latest twelve months at 1 Oct 2026. NLRB election results are not loaded in this build. US government works, public domain; USAspending data is released under CC0. Page built 1 Oct 2026; errors in processing are corrected at the next build (corrections). Disputes about a record go to the agency that holds it.