Employer Ledger

States › Michigan › Construction of Buildings

Triangle Associates

Grand Rapids, Michigan · NAICS 236220 · 110 employees reported · 30 federal records

OSHA: 29 insp.Injuries: 3 yrLabor: 1 caseImmigration: no recordContracts: not listed

Across the sources on this site, Triangle Associates (Grand Rapids, Michigan) appears in 29 OSHA inspections, 1 concluded Wage and Hour Division case and 3 years of injury summaries.

OSHA opened 29 inspections at Triangle Associates sites in Michigan since 2016, issuing 17 citations, 8 of them classified serious, willful or repeat. Current penalties total $7,100 (initially $17,700), $245 per inspection, below the national figure of $3,754. 2 inspections have at least one contested citation.

On its 2025 Form 300A summary the employer reported 110 employees and 1 recordable case, a total recordable case rate of 0.9 per 100 full-time workers, lower than the pooled rate for its industry (1.7; median establishment 0.0).

The Wage and Hour Division concluded 1 compliance action involving Triangle Associates, recording $1,024 in back wages agreed to pay for 2 employees, under the Davis-Bacon and Related Acts.

OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Citations may be contested; the status shown reflects the record at the data date. Enforcement data through 14 Sep 2026.

29inspections since 2016
17citations issued8 serious, willful or repeat
$7,100current penaltiesinitial $18K
2inspections with a contested citation5 with final orders on all

Inspections by year

20162017201820212022202320252026
Inspections opened per year; 2016: 0 citations, $0 · 2017: 14 citations, $5,800 · 2018: 0 citations, $0 · 2021: 0 citations, $0 · 2022: 1 citations, $600 · 2023: 0 citations, $0 · 2025: 0 citations, $0 · 2026: 2 citations, $700.

Compared with industry, state and nation

MeasureThis employerNAICS 236MichiganUS
Citations per inspection0.61.22.21.9
Current penalty per inspection$245$2,116$1,319$3,754
Share of inspections with a contested citation7%—5%8%
Share of inspections with final orders on every citation17%—60%56%

Inspections with no citations count as "issued" with zero citations. Industry and state figures cover every inspection in the enforcement data since 2016, including employers without a page.

Citations by standard

StandardSubjectCitations
408.41729(1)—2
1926.1203—2
408.22141(1)—1
408.22141(2)—1
408.40941(1)—1
408.42159(2)—1
408.40933(2)—1
408.41721—1
408.41723(3)(E)—1
408.41731(2)—1
408.41719(1)—1
1926.501Duty to have fall protection1

Standard numbers as the record labels them (29 CFR section; 5(a)(1) is the General Duty Clause). State-plan agencies such as Cal/OSHA cite their own codes, which appear here as recorded. Counted from the first twelve citations of each inspection.

Inspections

OpenedTypeScopeCitationsCurrent penaltyStatusCited standards
27 May 2026Planned · SafetyComplete2$700Contested408.41729(1), 408.22141(1)
22 Sep 2025Planned · SafetyComplete0—Case closed
23 Jul 2025Planned · HealthPartial0—Case closed
21 Apr 2025Planned · SafetyComplete0—Case closed
5 Sep 2023Referral · SafetyPartial0—Case closed
24 May 2023Planned · SafetyComplete0—Case closed
17 Oct 2022Planned · SafetyComplete1$600Contested, final order408.22141(2)
5 Oct 2022Planned · SafetyComplete0—Case closed
4 Jan 2022Planned · SafetyComplete0—Case closed
20 Dec 2021Planned · HealthPartial0—Case closed
20 Dec 2021Planned · SafetyComplete0—Case closed
20 Oct 2021Planned · SafetyComplete0—Case closed
8 Oct 2021Planned · SafetyComplete0—Case closed
24 Sep 2021Planned · SafetyComplete0—Case closed
29 Jul 2021Programmed related · HealthPartial0—Case closed
19 Feb 2021Planned · SafetyComplete0—Case closed
21 Mar 2018Planned · SafetyNo inspection0—Case closed
21 Feb 2018Planned · SafetyComplete0—Case closed
26 Oct 2017Planned · SafetyComplete3 (1 S/W/R)$1,200Final order408.40941(1) (Serious), 408.42159(2), 408.40933(2)
9 Oct 2017Complaint · SafetyPartial5 (5 S/W/R)$1,800Final order408.41721 (Serious), 408.41723(3)(E) (Serious), 408.41729(1) (Serious), 408.41731(2) (Serious), 408.41719(1) (Serious)
19 Apr 2017Planned · SafetyComplete0—Case closed
29 Mar 2017Planned · SafetyComplete0—Case closed
6 Mar 2017Planned · HealthComplete0—Case closed
27 Feb 2017Planned · SafetyPartial0—Case closed
17 Feb 2017Planned · SafetyComplete2 (1 S/W/R)$2,400Final order1926.501(b)(4)(ii) (Repeat), 1926.602(a)(9)(i)

Most recent 25 of 29 inspections. Status is per inspection: "Contested" when any citation has a contest date and "Final order" when every citation has a final order date; "Issued" otherwise. Violation types: S serious, W willful, R repeat. Each date links to the inspection detail on osha.gov.

Injuries OSHA Injury Tracking Application, Form 300A

Establishments submit their own Form 300A summaries; OSHA publishes the data as submitted and does not verify it. Rates are per 100 full-time workers (cases × 200,000 ÷ hours worked). Calendar years 2023–2025.

0.9total recordable case rate, 2025industry median 0.0
0.0DART rate (days away, restricted or transferred)industry 1.0
110employees reported, 20251 establishment
1recordable cases, 20250 deaths, 0 with days away

Injury rate vs industry

This employer0.9
Industry median (236)0.0
Industry overall1.7
Michigan overall3.4
All establishments3.5

Total recordable case rate for 2025. The industry median is the median rate across establishments with at least 20,000 hours in NAICS 236 (quartiles 0.0–3.3); "overall" rates pool all hours and cases.

By year

YearEstablishmentsEmployeesHoursDeathsDays awayRestricted/transferOtherTRC rateDART rate
20231110212,81800223.81.9
20241110214,57800212.81.9
20251110226,41900010.90.0

Figures sum every establishment filed under this employer name in Michigan. Rates are blank where fewer than 2,000 hours were reported.

Labor Wage and Hour Division

The Wage and Hour Division publishes concluded compliance actions since fiscal year 2005; amounts are back wages the employer agreed to pay and civil money penalties assessed, as recorded at case conclusion. Data through 15 Jun 2026.

1concluded cases
$1,024back wages agreed to pay2 employees
$0civil money penalties assessed
3violations recorded

Back wages by year of case conclusion

2017
Back wages agreed to pay by year; 2017: 1 case.

Compared with state and nation

MeasureThis employerNAICS 236MichiganUS
Back wages per case$1,024$17K$9,414$13K
Employees per case2.0—13.113.1
Back wages per employee found due$512—$721$993

Acts

ActViolationsBack wages
Davis-Bacon and Related Acts3$1,024

Cases

Findings periodViolationsBack wages agreedEmployeesPenaltiesActsStatus
19 Jun 2016 – 19 Feb 20173$1,0242—Davis-Bacon and Related ActsConcluded

Every case in the WHD file is concluded; the file does not record whether back wages were subsequently paid. Case IDs: 1812925.

Immigration Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Employer-specific case information was provided to OFLC by employers who submitted foreign labor certification applications. These are not employer responses to the Bureau of Labor Statistics' survey. Wage levels I–IV are as the employer stated on the application. LCA data through 30 Jun 2026; PERM through 30 Jun 2026.

No labor condition application from this employer in Michigan appears in OFLC disclosure data for fiscal years 2025–2026.

No PERM application from this employer appears in the fiscal years covered.

Contracts USAspending.gov

USAspending recipient totals are federal contract obligations reported by awarding agencies for the latest twelve months; a recipient profile is a company-level record, not a per-state one. Retrieved 1 Oct 2026.

Not among the top 3,903 federal contract recipients loaded from USAspending for the latest twelve months. Smaller awards can be searched on USAspending.gov.

Questions and answers

Has OSHA inspected Triangle Associates?

Yes. OSHA records 29 inspections at Triangle Associates sites in Michigan since 2016, most recently opened 27 May 2026.

Were there penalties, and are they final?

17 citations with current penalties totalling $7,100. 5 inspections have a final order on every citation, 2 have a contested citation and 23 are recorded as issued. Citations may be contested; the status shown reflects the record at the data date.

Did the Labor Department find back wages due from Triangle Associates?

The Wage and Hour Division's concluded cases record $1,024 in back wages agreed to pay across 1 case, for 2 employees.

Does Triangle Associates sponsor H-1B workers, and at what wages?

No labor condition application from Triangle Associates in Michigan appears in OFLC disclosure data for fiscal years 2025–2026. LCAs are filed by the employer's headquarters state, so a subsidiary or another state's entity may hold the filings.

Does Triangle Associates sponsor green cards (PERM)?

No PERM application from the employer appears in the fiscal years covered.

Does Triangle Associates hold federal contracts?

It is not among the top federal contract recipients loaded from USAspending; smaller awards are not covered on this site.

Have there been union elections at Triangle Associates?

NLRB election results are not loaded on this site at present, so this page cannot say either way. The NLRB publishes recent election results and a case search on nlrb.gov.

Is this the same company as the one I am looking for?

Records are matched by normalised name and state. Subsidiaries, franchisees and other states' entities have their own records. See the methodology for how matching works.

Provenance

OSHA inspections and violations: US Department of Labor enforcement data, data.dol.gov, through 14 Sep 2026, inspections opened since 2016. Injury summaries: OSHA Injury Tracking Application Form 300A data, calendar years 2023, 2024, 2025. Wage and Hour compliance actions: data.dol.gov, concluded cases through 15 Jun 2026. LCA and PERM: OFLC disclosure files, fiscal years 2025–2026 through 30 Jun 2026. Federal contracts: USAspending recipient API, latest twelve months at 1 Oct 2026. NLRB election results are not loaded in this build. US government works, public domain; USAspending data is released under CC0. Page built 1 Oct 2026; errors in processing are corrected at the next build (corrections). Disputes about a record go to the agency that holds it.