Starbucks Corporation: Workplace records, Corning, California
This record is one of 10 states of the company record Starbucks Coffee Company: all states
OSHA opened 17 inspections at Starbucks Corporation in California since 2016. The inspections have 12 citations. 6 inspections have a contested citation.
The Wage and Hour Division concluded 1 case at Starbucks Corporation in California since fiscal year 2005. This case records no back wages agreed to pay.
Is this the same company?
The site joins the records of each agency by employer name and by state. It has no other key.
A record on this page can belong to a different firm that has the same name.
The site keeps a hand list of names that it treats as one employer. This employer is on the list. The list holds: STARBUCKS COFFEE; STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY; STARBUCKS CORPORATION. Some of these names can be separate legal entities.
Since the last update
No change. The site tracks the LCA filings, PERM applications, OSHA inspections and back wages of this employer record. Changes and data dates
OSHA inspections: Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Records to Inspections opened since 2016Read from the agency
Until cases are closed, IMIS entries concerning specific OSHA inspections are subject to continuing correction and updating, particularly with regard to citation items, which are subject to modification by amended citations, settlement agreements, or as a result of contest proceedings. THE USER SHOULD ALSO BE AWARE THAT DIFFERENT COMPANIES MAY HAVE SIMILAR NAMES AND CLOSE ATTENTION TO THE ADDRESS MAY BE NECESSARY TO AVOID MISINTERPRETATION.
The words of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Source: Establishment Search, read .
- Inspections since 2016
- 17
- Citations
- 122 serious, willful or repeat
- Current penalties
- $13,985initial $17,815
- Inspections with a contested citation
- 67 with a final order on every citation
| Year | Inspections | Citations | Current penalties |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 | 1 | $175 |
| 2019 | 2 | 1 | $1,000 |
| 2021 | 1 | 0 | $0 |
| 2023 | 4 | 5 | $8,580 |
| 2024 | 2 | 1 | $3,000 |
| 2025 | 5 | 2 | $670 |
| 2026 | 2 | 2 | $560 |
| All years | 17 | 12 | $13,985 |
The status is for each inspection. "Contested" means that a citation has a contest date. "Final order" means that every citation has a final order date. Each date links to the inspection on osha.gov.
| Standard | Citations |
|---|---|
| 2340.16 | 2 |
| 3203(A)(6)(A) | 1 |
| 5204(I)(1) | 1 |
| 3396(H)(1) | 1 |
| 3396(I) | 1 |
| 342(A) | 1 |
| 5142(B)(3) | 1 |
| 3203(A) | 1 |
| 3273(A) | 1 |
| 3203(A)(6) | 1 |
| 3400(C) | 1 |
| Measure | This record | NAICS 722 | California | United States |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citations for each inspection | 0.7 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| Current penalty for each inspection | $823 | $2,088 | $3,731 | $3,764 |
| Inspections with a contested citation | 35% | No data | 27% | 8% |
Back wages: Wage and Hour Division
Concluded cases to Cases since fiscal year 2005Read from the agency
The dataset contains all concluded WHD compliance actions since FY 2005. The dataset includes whether any violations were found and the back wage amount, number of employees due back wages, and civil money penalties assessed. NOTE: Findings Start Date and Findings End Date are not equal to Case Open Date and Case Close Date, which are not included in the dataset.
The words of the Wage and Hour Division. Source: Open Data Portal, dataset Enforcement, read .
- Concluded cases
- 1
- Back wages agreed to pay
- $0for 0 employees
- Civil money penalties
- $0
- Violations recorded
- 0
| Year | Cases | Back wages agreed to pay | Employees |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 1 | $0 | 0 |
| All years | 1 | $0 | 0 |
| Case | Findings period | Violations | Back wages agreed to pay | Employees | Acts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1387814 | 22 Dec 2002 to 22 Dec 2004 | 0 | $0 | 0 | None stated |
| Act | Violations | Back wages agreed to pay |
|---|
Every case in the file is concluded. The file does not say if the employer paid the back wages.
No record at these agencies
Injury summaries
The Injury Tracking Application data for 2023 to 2025 has no Form 300A summary of this employer in California. Only establishments in covered industries with 20 or more employees must send one.
Calendar years 2023 to 2025. Read from the committed copy.
Federal contracts
This employer is not among the 3,903 largest federal contract recipients of the latest 12 months that the site loads from USAspending.
Period the latest 12 months. Read from the agency.
H-1B and PERM
The OFLC data for fiscal years 2025 to 2026 has no LCA filing and no PERM application of this employer in California. OFLC files an application under the state of the employer address. So another state record of the same name can hold the filings.
Records of this name with LCA filings: Washington.
Decisions to . Newest file fiscal year 2026, quarter 3. Read from the committed copy.
Union elections
The site holds no NLRB election results at this time. nlrb.gov did not accept the requests of the site, so the copy is empty.
Data none, the copy on this site is empty. Not read from the agency.
Records matched to this name in other states
The site matches these records by name only. A listed record can belong to a different legal entity, such as an unrelated firm with the same name.
| State | Name on the record | City | Records | LCA filings | OSHA inspections |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florida | Starbucks Coffee Company | Orlando | 7 | 0 | 5 |
| Illinois | Starbucks Coffee Company | Fairview Heights | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Michigan | Starbucks | Ann Arbor | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Nevada | Starbucks | Minden | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| New York | Starbucks | New York | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Oklahoma | Starbucks Corporation | Oklahoma City | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Utah | Starbucks Coffee Corp. | South Salt Lake | 6 | 0 | 3 |
| Virginia | Starbucks Corporation | Richmond | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Washington | Starbucks Coffee Company | Seattle | 400 | 314 | 21 |
The company record adds up all the states.
Other employers in California
These links help you move through the records. The list is in name order. It is not a ranking.
Food Services and Drinking Places in California
- Blue House Restaurant Roseville, Inc.Roseville
- Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.Pinole
- Dutch Bros CoffeeBrentwood
- G&t Entertainment IncFresno
- Kentucky Fried ChickenSylmar
- Little Caesars PizzaYucca Valley
- Mountain Mike's PizzaCampbell
- Papa John's PizzaRedondo Beach
- Peets Coffee, Inc.Emeryville
- Pizza HutLake Elsinore
- Round Table PizzaDaly City
- Yum Yum DonutsLos Angeles
Questions about this record
- Are the OSHA citations of Starbucks Corporation final?
- Of the 17 inspections, 7 have a final order on every citation. The current penalties are $13,985. The initial penalties were $17,815.
- What do the Wage and Hour Division cases record?
- The case records 0 violations and $0 in civil money penalties.
- Until which date do the records run?
- OSHA records run to 23 September 2026. Wage and Hour Division cases run to 15 June 2026. OFLC decisions run to 30 June 2026.
Official channels
- OSHAOSHA establishment searchOccupational Safety and Health Administration. Address checked .
- WHDHow to file a complaint with the Wage and Hour DivisionWage and Hour Division. Address checked .
Cite this page
Employer Ledger. "Starbucks Corporation (California)." https://employerledger.com/employer/starbucks-corporation-ca/. Records of: Occupational Safety and Health Administration; Wage and Hour Division. Newest record .
The address of this page does not change. The figures change when an agency publishes new records.
Where the figures come from
- OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Records to . Inspections opened since 2016. Read , from the agency.
- 300A OSHA Injury Tracking Application, Form 300A. Calendar years 2023 to 2025. Read , from the committed copy.
- WHD Wage and Hour Division. Concluded cases to . Cases since fiscal year 2005. Read , from the agency.
- USAspending USAspending.gov. Period the latest 12 months. Read , from the agency.
- OFLC Office of Foreign Labor Certification. Decisions to . Newest file fiscal year 2026, quarter 3. Read , from the committed copy.
The site built this page on . The methodology tells how records are matched and counted. To report an error in the processing, use the corrections page. The agency that holds a record decides disputes about it.