States › North Carolina › Gasoline Stations
Friendly Mart
OSHA: no recordInjuries: no recordLabor: 6 casesImmigration: no recordContracts: not listed
The federal record for Friendly Mart, Albemarle, North Carolina, consists of 6 concluded Wage and Hour Division cases; the employer is classified under Gasoline Stations.
The Wage and Hour Division concluded 6 compliance actions involving Friendly Mart, recording $3,817 in back wages agreed to pay for 7 employees, under the Fair Labor Standards Act and Family and Medical Leave Act.
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Citations may be contested; the status shown reflects the record at the data date. Enforcement data through 14 Sep 2026.
No OSHA inspection of this employer in North Carolina appears in the enforcement data since 2016. Inspections are recorded at the establishment; sites in other states are listed under those states.
Injuries OSHA Injury Tracking Application, Form 300A
Establishments submit their own Form 300A summaries; OSHA publishes the data as submitted and does not verify it. Rates are per 100 full-time workers (cases × 200,000 ÷ hours worked). Calendar years 2023–2025.
No Form 300A summary for this employer in North Carolina is in the Injury Tracking Application data for 2023, 2024, 2025. Only establishments in covered industries with 20 or more employees (100 or more in some industries) must submit.
Labor Wage and Hour Division
The Wage and Hour Division publishes concluded compliance actions since fiscal year 2005; amounts are back wages the employer agreed to pay and civil money penalties assessed, as recorded at case conclusion. Data through 15 Jun 2026.
Back wages by year of case conclusion
Compared with state and nation
| Measure | This employer | NAICS 447 | North Carolina | US |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Back wages per case | $636 | $5,899 | $9,718 | $13K |
| Employees per case | 1.2 | — | 10.1 | 13.1 |
| Back wages per employee found due | $545 | — | $959 | $993 |
Acts
| Act | Violations | Back wages |
|---|---|---|
| Fair Labor Standards Act | 11 | $3,817 |
| Family and Medical Leave Act | 681 | $0 |
Cases
| Findings period | Violations | Back wages agreed | Employees | Penalties | Acts | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2018 – 16 Aug 2020 | 0 | $0 | 0 | — | — | Concluded |
| 29 Apr 2014 – 28 Apr 2016 | 361 | $0 | 0 | — | Fair Labor Standards Act, Family and Medical Leave Act | Concluded |
| 11 Apr 2014 – 11 Apr 2016 | 2 | $0 | 0 | — | Fair Labor Standards Act, Family and Medical Leave Act | Concluded |
| 12 Apr 2014 – 11 Apr 2016 | 320 | $0 | 0 | — | Family and Medical Leave Act | Concluded |
| 4 Feb 2007 – 3 Feb 2009 | 7 | $616 | 6 | — | Fair Labor Standards Act | Concluded |
| 9 Nov 2004 – 10 Nov 2006 | 2 | $3,201 | 1 | — | Fair Labor Standards Act | Concluded |
Every case in the WHD file is concluded; the file does not record whether back wages were subsequently paid. Case IDs: 1912852, 1788723, 1788725, 1788718, 1525831, ….
Immigration Office of Foreign Labor Certification
Employer-specific case information was provided to OFLC by employers who submitted foreign labor certification applications. These are not employer responses to the Bureau of Labor Statistics' survey. Wage levels I–IV are as the employer stated on the application. LCA data through 30 Jun 2026; PERM through 30 Jun 2026.
No labor condition application from this employer in North Carolina appears in OFLC disclosure data for fiscal years 2025–2026.
No PERM application from this employer appears in the fiscal years covered.
Contracts USAspending.gov
USAspending recipient totals are federal contract obligations reported by awarding agencies for the latest twelve months; a recipient profile is a company-level record, not a per-state one. Retrieved 1 Oct 2026.
Not among the top 3,903 federal contract recipients loaded from USAspending for the latest twelve months. Smaller awards can be searched on USAspending.gov.
Questions and answers
Has OSHA inspected Friendly Mart?
No OSHA inspection of Friendly Mart in North Carolina appears in the enforcement data since 2016.
Were there penalties, and are they final?
No OSHA record, so no penalties to report.
Did the Labor Department find back wages due from Friendly Mart?
The Wage and Hour Division's concluded cases record $3,817 in back wages agreed to pay across 6 cases, for 7 employees.
Does Friendly Mart sponsor H-1B workers, and at what wages?
No labor condition application from Friendly Mart in North Carolina appears in OFLC disclosure data for fiscal years 2025–2026. LCAs are filed by the employer's headquarters state, so a subsidiary or another state's entity may hold the filings.
Does Friendly Mart sponsor green cards (PERM)?
No PERM application from the employer appears in the fiscal years covered.
Does Friendly Mart hold federal contracts?
It is not among the top federal contract recipients loaded from USAspending; smaller awards are not covered on this site.
Have there been union elections at Friendly Mart?
NLRB election results are not loaded on this site at present, so this page cannot say either way. The NLRB publishes recent election results and a case search on nlrb.gov.
Is this the same company as the one I am looking for?
Records are matched by normalised name and state. Subsidiaries, franchisees and other states' entities have their own records. See the methodology for how matching works.
Provenance
OSHA inspections and violations: US Department of Labor enforcement data, data.dol.gov, through 14 Sep 2026, inspections opened since 2016. Injury summaries: OSHA Injury Tracking Application Form 300A data, calendar years 2023, 2024, 2025. Wage and Hour compliance actions: data.dol.gov, concluded cases through 15 Jun 2026. LCA and PERM: OFLC disclosure files, fiscal years 2025–2026 through 30 Jun 2026. Federal contracts: USAspending recipient API, latest twelve months at 1 Oct 2026. NLRB election results are not loaded in this build. US government works, public domain; USAspending data is released under CC0. Page built 1 Oct 2026; errors in processing are corrected at the next build (corrections). Disputes about a record go to the agency that holds it.